Browse > Home / Archive: August 2002

| Subcribe via RSS

The Buddhist Threat

August 29th, 2002 | Comments | Posted in Buddhism, Esoteric, Spirituality
635 people have read this post.

Occultists and pagans are threatened by Buddhism or, more correctly, occultists and pagans view Buddhism as a threat.

This is what I can gather by watching exchanges on the topic of Buddhism by pagans and occultists that I know. and have posted a bit recently about it on LJ and on an e-mail list that we are all on for (along with many others). Of course, it isn’t simply them. I’ve seen this reaction a lot over the last few years when the topic of Buddhism has come up. I have aquaintances that have taken empowerments at various points in the pagan community. Hell, even my mother has for White Tara, as I recall. It has come up as a topic of conversation.

One reaction that I’ve seen is that some feel that Buddhism is some kind of viral disease that will infect wholesome pagan practices or people and slowly turn them into non-pagan Buddhists (as contradictory as that turn of phrase is). Slowly Buddhism will convert us until nothing but itself is left behind. Given Buddhism’s history of actually spreading actively, that isn’t an insane view but I don’t think it reflects the nature of what is happening or why people become involved with Buddhism, specifically Tantric Buddhism.

Alobar is concerned that taking refuge isn’t Thelemic and is perhaps copping out of the system or of reality with all it’s joy and sorrow. I don’t think so but I’m not articulate enough on this particular topic (think of it, me not articulate…) to really discuss the issues in an intelligent manner, especially when much more qualified people are available.

Tantric Buddhism is a magical path. It is about awareness and experienced knowledged. It is Gnosis of the nature of things, whether it be you, the universe as a whole or what’s going on in the world. Those can’t even be separated. While I haven’t really grasped things as well as I can eventually, it is because I haven’t had the time involved in both study and practice to do so, not because it isn’t comprehensible. It’s a completely different mode of thought than what I’ve been exposed to in studying Western magic but I don’t think it is necessarily as different as some would make it out to be.

The turning point for me, possibly, was when I thought about how many occultists and pagans I knew who really seem to be better people because of their magical work. I could not think of many. Perhaps most people simply don’t practice but it has often been offered to me as a truism by people that I considered adepts on the path that knowledge and conversation and the practice of the path of return does not, at least for a long while, guarantee that you are a nice person or someone that people would want to be around. Crowley was a shit and there’s no two ways about that. So were many other famous magicians. I’m lucky that I do know personal examples that are good. Now, I know of a number of questionable Buddhist teachers. They aren’t that hard to find if you sniff around. That being said, all of the lamas that I’ve interacted with personally have been incredible figures. You could feel the warmth and joy that came off of them. Sure, they are people and do petty things perhaps but it was quite a difference from what I’ve experienced in the occult community over the last 13 years of my involvement.

I blame this sense of realness and warmth on the emphasis, constant, on compassion for other beings, especially the people around you. I also blame it on the requirements for real practice and realization to be recognized as capable of teaching as a lama. I’m not completely informed on all of the work that is done but you constantly hear about the requirement for a three year retreat before one is ordained. That’s three years, people, not a week, not six months of Abramelin work. Now, this being the world, I’m sure there are people skating around this but it’s a lot more of a requirement than you see in the magical community and I think that it shows.

I don’t care about “currents” be they the “Thelemic Current” or the “Golden Dawn Current” or anything else. I don’t really care about the ongoing debate on many lists for many years about whether something is “Old Aeon” or “New Aeon.” Fuck it.

What do I care about? I care about RESULTS. I care about GNOSIS on a true and person level. I care about being AWARE at a true level beyond the superficiality around us. Additionally, I care about trying to be a better human being and being the fullest whatever-I-am that I can be. I don’t care about pedantic semantical arguments about which hebrew letter should be moved to where on the Tree of Life and why. I don’t care about group politics or bullshit primate group dynamics. Other people can play those games. I’m done with it.

So, this rambled a bit but I guess, in the end, that I covered about as much as I can say. I could discover something about Buddhism next week that would drive me apeshit. I dislike the level of orthodoxy and control that Buddhist institutions maintain. It reminds me of the Catholic Church but that isn’t the original context of the teachings and path as it came out of India and that isn’t necessarily the context in the future. It is a living path that produces real results which are readily visible when you meet a teacher who has some attainment. I’m going to remember that the next time I’m at a thelemic event with some blow-hard discussing how he can change the weather at will but still can’t seem to get a job.

Fuck Bush and Fuck Iraq

August 24th, 2002 | Comments | Posted in Daily Life, Society
1768 people have read this post.

Alright, so my title is a little inflamatory. I got in a fun near flamewar on a local list within the last couple of weeks because I was soliciting others to get together to protest any invasion of Iraq if it occured.

A friend has posted some links to various places online to add to the efforts to lodge protests against such a war (for all of the good it will do).

I did find this fun site this evening. Heh. I like the posters:

backtheattack

silence

Cirque Du Soleil

August 24th, 2002 | Comments | Posted in Daily Life
773 people have read this post.

R and I went to Cirque Du Soleil this evening (well, yesterday now but I haven't gone to bed yet). We wound up getting there about an hour early because I had planned for traffic and got to hang out at the expensive beer garden for a while. I have a feeling that they make as much on the concession stand as on anything else. ;-)

The show was “Dralion” and it was pretty good. I can safely say that I've never seen anything like it in person before. I wasn't quite as blown away as some people as I've seen people doing many of the same tricks (though not the acrobatics) in the last year or so of hanging out with the Cabiri. I suffer from gear envy though. They've got a lot of obviously cool equipment. I'm sure and J were salivating over their aerial gear and harnesses.

The best trick they pulled on everyone is that since they are well known for picking on poor audience members, no one thought twice when the clowns at the opening and various points kept singling out this one guy. He was 40ish, dressed well and clean cut. I had him pegged as some kind of management yuppie. They got him when he was trying to sit down and one of the clowns led him all over the place with him being a good sport. Shortly after that, they dragged him on stage to read part of the opening safety instructions, stole his wallet and generally teased him. He seemed a bit klutzy and kept laughing at himself. He acted about as fumbly, confused but trying to be good natured as you'd expect an audience member to be during it all. Later on, the clowns dragged him on stage again and while getting him to mime things with them, stole his shoe. He got his shoe back but in a really smooth seeming move, one of the clowns pulled his shirt off while he was bent over and taunted him with it. After much back and forth and stumbling about, the guy seemed to be losing his cool a little bit and then suddenly he does this spinning kick and jump thing and then a back flip… oops, RINGER! He bows with the clown and runs off stage with him. This had been going on and off for probably an hour. When things got slow, the clowns came out, did games and funny stuff and every now and then they picked on this guy. As R pointed out, the only slight giveaway is that when he read from the card early on, he was obviously not a native English speaker. He did a great job of seeming not terribly adept, at being a little clumsy with things and not terribly comfortable on stage. I was taken and impressed. Later on, he was on with the clowns in a couple of pieces and it was pretty clear that he was a clown and an acrobat too so it really was an act. They did this whole piece near the end that was a parody of pieces that we'd seen earlier, including mocking trapeze work and dance.

The other really cool thing (and there were many cool things in the show) was one of the final trapeze acts. There was a man and woman pair in blue that descended from the aerial staging area above and did work together with the form of trapeze that is two guazy pieces of cloth (anyone?). They were obviously a paired act and did an incredible job working together as a team on the one pair of cloth pieces. Lots of spinning hanging, hanging from each other, flying around the stage together, etc. They did some fast moving work over 40 feet off the ground and I noticed that, unlike many of the other performers, neither was wearing a safety line. Here is this guy hanging free from the woman, who was anchored in the trapeze, with just the two of them grasping wrists to keep himself from falling. He then swung from her with just one arm to arm connection between the two of them. I'm impressed by skillful work 40+ feet up with no safety equipment and everything resting on one handhold with another person. They were good.

The acrobats were good. I have a feeling that they recruited from Chinese wu shu schools someplace as a lot of the acrobatics were in a similar fashion to the wu shu demonstrations/performances I've seen (but with a lot more people and a lot more intense) and all of the male and female acrobats, with a few exceptions, were obviously Chinese.

The outfits on the singers did remind R and I of 70s David Bowie though.