Browse > Home / Archive: March 2005

| Subcribe via RSS

Nader Loses It

March 26th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Daily Life
514 people have read this post.

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=44858

WASHINGTON, March 24 /U.S. Newswire/ — Consumer Advocate Ralph
Nader and Wesley J. Smith, author of the award winning book “Culture of
Death: The Assault on Medical Ethics in America” call upon the Florida
Courts, Governor Jeb Bush and concerned citizens to take any legal
action available to let Terri Schiavo live.

“A profound injustice is being inflicted on Terri Schiavo,” Nader
and Smith asserted today. “Worse, this slow death by dehydration is
being imposed upon her under the color of law, in proceedings in which
every benefit of the doubt-and there are many doubts in this case-has
been given to her death, rather than her continued life.”

Among the many injustices in this case, Nader and Smith point to the following:

The courts not only are refusing her tube feeding, but have ordered
that no attempts be made to provide her water or food by mouth. Terri
swallows her own saliva. Spoon feeding is not medical treatment. “This
outrageous order proves that the courts are not merely permitting
medical treatment to be withheld, it has ordered her to be made dead,”
Nader and Smith assert.

Lord Ganesh

March 25th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Buddhism
802 people have read this post.

This last summer, I was exposed to Ganesh or Ganapati in a Tibetan Buddhist context. Up to this point, I’d only been familiar with him from the Hindu context:

Hindu Ganesh

I’d always been fond of Ganesh as an opener of ways, a clearer of obstacles. I am friends with a number of Shaivite Tantrikas and they are all quite fond of him. Whether I could be considered a strict Buddhist Tantric practitioner is pretty open to questions on most days. Ganesh was once the primary deity of some tantric sects, as Mike Magee mentions
here:

Until the middle ages c.e., it appears that there was a separate cult of tantriks, the Ganapatyas, who followed this Deva and his Shakti. Like Shiva, he was worshipped via a linga, but in this case red.

Mike also quotes Arthur Avalon on Mahaganapati:

“…he is to be meditated upon as seated on a lotus consisting of the letters of the alphabet. The sadhaka should meditate upon an island composed of nine gems, placed in an ocean of sugarcane juice; a soft gentle breeze blows over the island and makes the waves wash the shore thereof. The place is a forest of Mandara, Parijata and other Kalpa trees and creepers, and the light from the gems thereon casts a red glow on the ground. The six gladdening seasons are always there. The sun and moon brighten up the place. In the middle of the island is a Parijata tree whereon are the nine gems and beneath it is the great Pitha (altar) on which is the lotus whereon is seated Mahaganapati. His face is that of the great elephant with the moon on it. He is red and has three eyes. He is held in loving embrace by his beloved who is seated in his lap and has a lotus in her hand. In each of his ten hands he is holding a pomegranate, a mace, a bow, a trident, a discus, a lotus, a noose, a red water-lily, a sheaf of paddy and his own tusk. He is holding a jewelled jar in his trunk. By the flapping of his ears, he is driving away the bees attracted to his temples by the fluid exuding therefrom, and he is scattering gems from out of the jar held in his trunk. He is wearing a ruby-studded crown and is adorned with gem.”

Sharadatilakatantra, Agamanusandhana Samiti, 1933.

This last summer, at retreat, I found out that Ganesh, like many Hindu gods, had been taken up by the tantric Buddhist practitioners long ago. Recently, I found images of a Tibetan Buddhist thangka to him, showing him in a very Tibetan style:

Ganesh Thangka

In any case, I found this pretty interesting though not for any easy to explain reason.

OM GAM GANAPATI SVAHA!

Flesch-Kincaid

March 24th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Academic, Daily Life
1069 people have read this post.

The Flesch-Kincaid scale measures the readability of writing. This came up today because someone ran a section of Neil Gaiman’s new novel that is available through this. Microsoft Word gives you the option of displaying readability after a spelling and grammar check.

A piece of writing with a 75% readability will be understood by 75% of readers. Writing with a grade level of 8 will be understood by anyone with an 8th grade education or higher.

I just ran my first two graduate history papers and my first three graduate philosophy papers through this. I receive pretty consistant results for all of them with small ranges. For these classes, I’m not particularly trying to speak “up” in my writing. I’m writing in a fairly normal manner. The only thing that is different than my standard writing style is I simplify sentences during my editing process and move some to a more active voice. I tend to write more with a passive voice for some reason and I also tend to longer sentences with a number of subclauses and such. The results are from after my process on my final papers. (I’ve gotten ‘A’s on the first paper for each class and no grades yet for the next. I just finished my final edit of my third philosophy paper tonight.)

Here are my results:

Characters per word: 4.9
Word per sentence: 18.6 (this went up to 21 on one paper)
Sentences per paragraph: 5.9

Passive voice: 11%
Reading Ease: 36.8%
Flesh-Kincaid Grade Level: 12.0 (this varies down to 11.1 on two papers)

I’m not sure if this is good or bad but I may not have a future as a popular writer of fiction since I seem to bury the needle on grade level. I wonder if this affects my e-mails at work?

Update: I ran a bunch of my blog entries through it. The grade level moves down to 8.4 to 9.0 but the other statistics are pretty much the same.