<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2K and Shipping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arcanology.com/2008/06/17/firefox-2k-and-shipping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arcanology.com/2008/06/17/firefox-2k-and-shipping/</link>
	<description>My studies and experiences in the realms of the mysteries...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title><img class='wavatar' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=db90ba29eaf90c7423860c2c7924ee4c.jpg&amp;s=50&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arcanology.com%2Fwp-content%2Fcache%2Fwavatars%2Fdb90ba29eaf90c742.png' width='50' height='50' alt='Wavatar' />By:  Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.arcanology.com/2008/06/17/firefox-2k-and-shipping/#comment-281504</link>
		<dc:creator><img class='wavatar' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=db90ba29eaf90c7423860c2c7924ee4c.jpg&amp;s=50&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arcanology.com%2Fwp-content%2Fcache%2Fwavatars%2Fdb90ba29eaf90c742.png' width='50' height='50' alt='Wavatar' /> Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/?p=2243#comment-281504</guid>
		<description>Running Firefox 3 on Win2k is great! To me one of the selling points of Firefox is that it runs on older OSes, reducing the need for upgrading older machines and thereby saving money!

Of course if you think that is something, I have had  Firefox 2.0.0.x running under NT 3.51 - for which there was NEVER a native 32-bit version of IE available. Screen shot: http://toastytech.com/guis/ff2nt351.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running Firefox 3 on Win2k is great! To me one of the selling points of Firefox is that it runs on older OSes, reducing the need for upgrading older machines and thereby saving money!</p>
<p>Of course if you think that is something, I have had  Firefox 2.0.0.x running under NT 3.51 - for which there was NEVER a native 32-bit version of IE available. Screen shot: <a href="http://toastytech.com/guis/ff2nt351.png" rel="nofollow">http://toastytech.com/guis/ff2nt351.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><img class='wavatar' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=0ae115f62d619ea5febb2ca641e7e845.jpg&amp;s=50&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arcanology.com%2Fwp-content%2Fcache%2Fwavatars%2F0ae115f62d619ea5f.png' width='50' height='50' alt='Wavatar' />By:  Adam Lawson</title>
		<link>http://www.arcanology.com/2008/06/17/firefox-2k-and-shipping/#comment-280742</link>
		<dc:creator><img class='wavatar' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=0ae115f62d619ea5febb2ca641e7e845.jpg&amp;s=50&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arcanology.com%2Fwp-content%2Fcache%2Fwavatars%2F0ae115f62d619ea5f.png' width='50' height='50' alt='Wavatar' /> Adam Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/?p=2243#comment-280742</guid>
		<description>Congratulations from a long time user (we're talking, *Mozilla* 0.9 era, and NN before that), and thank you for a wonderful browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations from a long time user (we&#8217;re talking, *Mozilla* 0.9 era, and NN before that), and thank you for a wonderful browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
